overview
past
& future
economics
studies
delivery
formats
monographs
dissertations
fiction
e-journals
newspapers
directories
film
music
webcasts
interactive
editing
business
education
government
culture
e-texts
devices
libraries
digitisation
on demand
rights trade
UGC
DIY
CMS
landmarks
|
newspapers
Eli Noam commented in 2005 that
electronic
publishing will be much more than print content without
paper. The differentiation between text, picture, audio,
and video will blur, and news sites will become multi-media.
Producing such rich news will be complex and expensive.
Realistically, no single news organisation will be able
to provide the quality and quantity of information needed
through its own economic and editorial resources. To
gain such diversity of information then, the news organisation
will be forced go far beyond its internally produced
content. Publishers will have to rely substantially
on other sources: traditional syndicated and wire-service
content; specialized magazines, trade journals, newsletters,
and books; blogs and other community sources; TV news
providers; and many free-lance journalists, investigative
reporters, pundits, and editors. In short, they will
have to become “virtual.”
This will lead to two archetypes of news organisations:
first, specialist content providers - some of them operating
from offshore - and similarly specialist marketing,
production, and advertising operators. And second, semi-virtual
integrators who bundle, pick and choose their content
and service elements from these specialists, validate
its quality, add some of their own, and shape the overall
character of the product. This will differentiate them
from the more passive portals and search engines such
as Google.
The problem for traditional news organisations is that
this type of virtual integrator function can also be
done by others. Today’s bloggers, for example,
already do so embryonically through hyperlinking to
chosen stories from other sources. In the future, some
of them will expand into full-fledged news-sites based
on such integration.
This does not mean a proliferation of large integrator-based
news sites. There are strong economies of scale and
network effects, and this means that, in time, market
leaders will emerge and drive traffic, advertising,
and hence larger budgets. With market power, these large
news sites become economically viable.
It is not clear what the competitive advantage of established
newspapers is in such a virtual model. They are too
big for the specialist shop model, and too expensive
or low-tech for the integrator model. Some have an established
brand which will draw users, such as the New York Times,
or the Financial Times. Other news organisations can
find some niche based on ideology or a brand image with
a loyal following.
But unless many of today’s conventional newspapers
manage the transition to virtual, integrated, and networked
information sites, they will have no real function beyond
that of greatly diminished specialist providers of local
information to bigger media integrators. Or, alternatively,
as the local brand for such national integrators, either
owned by them or in their orbit.
next page
(directories)
|
|