overview
BDM
citizenship
ownership
professions
trades
justice
health
business
services
officials
other

related
Guides:
Privacy
Security
Consumers

related
Profiles:
Offender
Registers
Australian
privacy
regimes
Australia
Card
Vetting
Reference
Services
Identity
Theft
|
justice
This
page considers the scope and scale of Australian offences
and security registers.
It covers -
introduction
As with other nations, Australia employs a wide range
of registration schemes regarding people who have committed
crimes (particularly those punished by imprisonment),
who work in 'sensitive' positions, such as in childcare
organisations, schools or airports or merely have sought
access to particular substances such as ammonium nitrate.
Changing perceptions of risk and threat mean that employment
in many mundane government positions requires some form
of vetting, for example to see whether a person has been
charged with an offence or merely has affiliations and
other attributes that are considered to pose concerns.
In aggregate that information now covers a substantial
part of the workforce. It is not held in a central register
or maintained by a single agency (or even by a single
government) but much of the data is electronic and there
is potential for wide-spread sharing among agencies and
with non-government bodies. Much of that sharing is unremarked;
some would appear to have substantial (albeit problematical)
support from the community at large because of beliefs
regarding 'stranger danger' and terrorism.
convictions
The
federal and state/territory spent conviction regimes are
broadly similar, providing for expungement of many juvenile
convictions and offences punished with under six months
prison sentences (subject to a crime-free period).
There is no specific spent convictions legislation in
Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia. In New South Wales,
Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia
legislation provides that most offenders do not need to
disclose the conviction - and the public records are sealed
- after a specific period of time. Some discrimination
is also prohibited.
More detailed information about the different 'spent convictions'
regimes is featured elsewhere
on this site.
sex
offenders
Exclusions to the spent convictions regimes reflect major
crimes, notably those involving children, with law reform
bodies grappling with concerns regarding employment of
sex offenders (evident in suggestions for strengthening
of the NSW Child Protection (Prohibited Employment)
Act 1998 and proposals in Victoria for photo ID and
registration under that state's Working With Children
law).
Australian regimes for the registration of sex offenders
have developed from state/territory criminal conviction
recording arrangements. There is considerable variation
across the jurisdictions and, as of 2005, no 'community
notification' schemes.
The Federal government CrimTrac agency operates a National
Child Sex Offender System, including notification of overseas
peers when convicted paedophiles report an intention to
leave Australia, but it does not monitor movement of individual
offenders within a state/territory as that is the responsibility
of the respective Government.
A non-public register of child sex offenders was for example
established in New South Wales in 2001 under the Child
Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 and
in Queensland in 1989 under the Criminal Law Amendment
Act 1945.
Australian and overseas police and community notification
schemes are explored in more detail elsewhere
on this site.
fingerprints
Law enforcement agencies have moved towards sharing of
biometric databases that
encompass information from people who have been arrested
and those who have merely undergone probity checks for
particular positions.
The Australian AFIS database contains around 2.6 million
fingerprint records
from individual State and Territory Police Agencies, including
what are claimed to be records from all people arrested
since 1941 and records from a range of official probity
checks (eg police applicants for appointment as a police
officer).
security
vetting
Security vetting by/for government agencies is discussed
in more detail here.
Given the size of the public sector (and turnover of personnel
within that sector) it is unsurprising that a large number
of checks are undertaken each year. The Australian Security
Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) for example indicated
that in 2005-6 it conducted 135,000 personnel security
checks "in the lead-up to the Commonwealth Games,
in the aviation and maritime sectors and for people seeking
access to ammonium nitrate". It also conducted 53,147
visa security assessments.
Maritime and air services cards
In 2004 the federal government announced establishment
of maritime and air services safety cards (characterisation
later changed to security identification cards) with the
expectation that all workers in maritime and aviation
'security zones' would be appropriately vetted and identified.
The two sets of cards are meant to provide nationally
consistent identification that shows the holder has met
minimum security requirements to remain unmonitored within
the relevant security zone. Applicants for a card must
undergo background checking conducted through the Australian
Federal Police, ASIO and Department of Immigration &
Multicultural Affairs (DIMA).
The Maritime Security Identification Card (MSIC), established
under the federal Maritime Transport and Offshore
Facilities Security Act 2003 (MTOFSA) and consistent
with the International Ship & Port Facility Security
Code (ISPS Code), covers port and port service workers,
stevedores, transport operators such as train and truck
drivers, seafarers on Australian regulated ships and people
who work on and/or supply offshore oil and gas facilities.
It is expected that there will be some 75,000 cards in
use by early 2007.
The Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 (ATSA)
extended the existing Aviation Security Identification
Card (ASIC) scheme to most airports. Anyone who works
in the airside area or landside security zone of an airport
with an ASIC scheme - for example baggage handlers and
check-in staff - must wear the card. Cards are issued
by an approved issuing body, such as operators of security
controlled airports and airlines.
next page
(health)
|
|