overview
responses
excuses
litigation
mobiles
the box
games
studies

related
Guides:
Digital
Environment

related
Notes:
Adult Content
Industry
Cybersuicide
|
responses
This page considers responses to 'internet addiction'.
It covers -
It
supplements discussion elsewhere on this site regarding
computer rage, sexuality, anxiety and other aspects of
life online.
pulling the plug
Responses to claims of pervasive cyber addiction have
taken several forms, including -
- scepticism
- provision
of corporate network management services
- different
therapies, some delivered online, that range from traditional
talking cures to behaviourist aversion training or recourse
to the power of prayer
One response has been to take addiction as a given and
therefore restrict access to the medium.
Websense, an 'employee management service', for example
promoted its wares in 2002 with discovery
of "one of the most highly addictive activities to
scourge the modern workplace", with 25% of employees
supposedly feeling addicted and a mere 8% of those polled
(some 305 US office workers) claiming no knowledge of
workplace web addiction.
Websense concluded that employee personal net usage centres
on news sites (67%) and shopping (37%), with 23% of employees
indicating that shopping is the "most addictive" online
content. 67% access news sites for personal reasons; 37%
access shopping and auction sites at the office.
2% of the surveyed employees admitted accessing "pornography"
and 2% admitted gambling online at work. Supposedly 70%
of "all Internet porn traffic" occurs during the nine-to-five
workday, up to 40% of surfing is not business-related
and over 60% of online purchases are made during that
time.
Websense regrettably did not benchmark those figures against
employee use of telephones.
It notes a comment from Marlene Maheu ("Internet addiction
expert" and CEO of an organization developing internet
and telehealth aids) that
Studies
have shown that from 25 to 50 percent of cyber-addiction
is occurring at the workplace ... That means employees
are getting paid to participate in activities that are
not work-related.
There
is recurrent media attention - typically at the end of
the year, when news is 'slow' and editors are barrel-scraping
- to claims that people suffer withdrawal
symptoms when deprived of the net.
It is unclear whether going cold turkey on the net is
much different from being deprived of a mobile phone (sometimes
characterised as contact addiction), snailmail or a video.
We are underwhelmed by accounts of the latest clinical
disorder but if you are an Oprah fan you'll probably enjoy
answers to questions such as "Why is the Internet
so seductive? What are the warning signs of Internet addiction?
Is recovery possible?" The corollary is presumably
the 'web rage' featured in a 2001 Roper Starch report:
more fender benders on the digital highway.
The Singapore Straits Times reported in 2001 that
psychiatrists were touring local high schools, talking
to children about the symptoms of IA. Supposedly, three
children per year sought help when the disorder was first
'discovered' in 1995. As of 2001 around 80 kids sought
help each year.
It is unclear whether that figure is higher than demands
for therapy to cure GameBoy, Pokemon or plain old fashioned
vanilla-style television. It is consistent with past accounts
of telephone addiction, featured in Ronell's The Telephone
Book or Tom Lutz' American Nervousness, 1903: An
Anecdotal History (Ithaca: Cornell Uni Press 1991).
Another response has been the emergence of the online
confession sites - such as Dailyconfession.com and Grouphug
("the idea is for anyone to anonymously confess to
anything") - highlighted in discussion
elsewhere on this site regarding mind & body in the
digital environment.
associated disorders?
It is unclear whether net addiction is associated with
other ICT disorders, substantive or otherwise, including
-
It
is also unclear whether supposed web addiction is associated
with the 'computer
rage' profiled by Kent Norman or the 'computer anxiety'
highlighted elsewhere
on this site.
Laura Miller noted
concerns about 'sex addiction' or online 'porn addiction',
commenting in 2008 that
Sex
addiction is particularly fraught because some critics
see it as a blame-dodging attempt to pass off moral
deviance as an illness. In yet another camp are those
who regard it as a veiled attempt to impose overly restrictive
standards of sexual normality. After all, a behavioral
addiction is usually defined as the irresistible impulse
to keep doing something even though you desperately
want to stop and despite the threat of harmful consequences
to your professional and personal life. By that standard,
simply being a practicing homosexual in pre-1970s America
could qualify as a sexual addiction. The consequences
(arrest, disgrace, shame) and the desire to stop (internalized
homophobia) we now see as the toll unjustly imposed
on gay men and lesbians by a sexually oppressive society;
at the time, few doubted that such people were "sick."
Little wonder, then, that some conservative religious
groups have latched on to the sexual addiction model,
allowing them to label any interest at all in pornography
or even masturbation as pathological.
the therapy industry
Figures about the size, shape, growth and effectiveness
of the cyberaddiction therapy industry are unclear. It
is thus similar to the adult
content industry, explored elsewhere on this site,
where there has been little critical analysis of claims
and many statements are self-interested.
So far there appear to have been no successful lawsuits
against software/hardware vendors and ISPs for providing
the means of addiction, in contrast to cases in the US
where plaintiffs sued fast-food outlets for wantonly causing
an addiction to fries and other takeaway treats.
Much of the writing about web addiction might be thought
of in terms of fashion and as a media phenomenon rather
than a discrete pathology, one situated in a culture where
there is a substantial market for Blue Water (promoted
as having had "negative memories" removed and
replaced with "beneficial energy patterns"),
Kabbalah Mountain Spring Water (which not only tastes
good but absorbs radiation, alleviates rheumatism and
has anti-ageing properties) and hocus
pocus.
Warden, Phillips & Ogloff's 2004 'Internet addiction'
paper in 11(2) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
(2004) commented that visitors to Young's
Center for Online Addiction are
offered
credit card deductible e-counselling in the form of
e-mail responses or, alternatively, they can purchase
self-help books and tapes, many produced by Young. However
the logic of conducting counseling and treatment via
the very medium that is creating or at least exacerbating
problems is questionable … Pathological gamblers
and individuals with substance dependence, for example,
are not treated in casinos and bars
Questions
about the 'addiction industry' and contemporary anxieties
are highlighted in The Culture Of Fear: Why Americans
Are Afraid Of The Wrong Thing (New York: Perseus
2000) by Barry Glassner, Manufacturing Victims: What
the Psychology Industry is Doing to People (London:
Constable 1998) by Tana Dineen, Therapy Culture: Cultivating
Vulnerability In An Uncertain Age (London: Routledge
2003) by Frank Furedi, Sham: How the Self-Help Movement
Made America Helpless (New York: Crown 2005) by Steve
Salerno and Adam Burgess' Cellular Phones, Public
Fears & A Culture of Precaution (Cambridge: Cambridge
Uni Press 2004).
A historical perspective is provided by Traumatic
Pasts: History, Psychiatry & Trauma in the Modern
Age, 1870-1930 (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press 2001)
edited by Mark Micale & Paul Lerner and Mind Games:
American Culture & the Birth of Psychotherapy
(Berkeley: Uni of California Press 1999) by Eric Caplan.
'A remedy for lonely hearts?' by Petra Boynton in 335
British Medical Journal (2007) 1240 noted -
a
new service that offers to help the millions of unattached
Britons infected by "dating toxins."
Are you single? Been on your own for six months or more?
If so you could be one of the estimated "5.6 million
British singles infected by dating toxins."
Research by online dating
agency PARSHIP suggests (according to its press release)
this "epidemic of dating misery" is caused
by "singles suffering from a build up of dating
toxins." These were identified via a survey of
5000 people as shyness, fussiness, low self esteem,
lack of opportunity, and desperation.
PARSHIP
has reportedly generously offered potential clients a
bespoke treatment combining cognitive behavioural therapy,
psychotherapy, dating etiquette, and - but of course -
a matchmaking service.
next page (excuses)
|
|