Caslon Analytics elephant logo title for Aust Privacy profile
home | about | site use | resources | publications | timeline   spacer graphic   Ketupa

overview

framework

principles

coherence

1988 Act

other law

2000 Act

states

codes

money

media

health

genetic

adoption

policing

justice

crimes

homes

workplace

retail

venues

politics

cases 1

cases 2

landmarks





















related pages icon
related
Guides:


Privacy

Secrecy

Censorship



related pages icon
related
Profiles:


Australian
Law


Human
Rights

Australian
Constitution
& Cyberspace


Credit
Reporting


Australia
Card


Registers

100 Points
Scheme


Intelligence
agencies






section heading icon     criminal convictions

This page considers Australian spent conviction (aka expunged records) and offender registration regimes.

It covers -

It is complemented by notes on vetting & identity verification services, on overseas offender registers and resume fraud.

subsection marker icon     introduction


The state/territory spent conviction regimes are broadly similar to the Commonwealth scheme outlined here, providing for expungement of many juvenile convictions and offences punished with under six months prison sentences (subject to a crime-free period).

There is no specific spent convictions legislation in Victoria and South Australia. In New South Wales, Queensland, the Northern Territory, Tasmania and Western Australia the legislation provides that most offenders do not need to disclose the conviction - and the public records are sealed - after a specific period of time. Some discrimination is also prohibited.

The major enactments are -

  • Spent Convictions Act 2000 (ACT) - here
  • Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW) - here
  • Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act (NT) - here
  • Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 (Qld) - here
  • Annulled Convictions Act 2003 (Tas) - here
  • Spent Convictions Act 1988 (WA) - here

The corresponding New Zealand legislation is the Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004. In South Australia convictions for certain offences are apparently transferred to an 'inactive file' after five to ten years.

Exclusions reflect major crimes, notably those involving children, with law reform bodies grappling with concerns regarding employment of sex offenders (evident in suggestions for strengthening of the NSW Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 and proposals in Victoria for photo ID and registration under that state's Working With Children law).

The federal Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commissioner thus commented in 2005 that

A basic principle of anti-discrimination is to enable an employer to refuse to employ someone if their criminal record is genuinely relevant to the essential requirements of the job. However, if a person's criminal record doesn't impact on the inherent requirements of the job, and that person is the best candidate for the job in every other way, these laws are designed to protect a person from being denied equal opportunity because of their criminal record

subsection marker icon     offender registration

Australian and overseas sex offender regimes (including the contentious US 'Megans Law' schemes) are discussed in more detail elsewhere on this site.

Issues with spent convictions are explored in the Australian Law Reform Commission's 1987 Spent Convictions report, the 2004 AIC report by Joe Graffam, Alison Shinkfield, Barbara Lavelle & Lesley Hardcastle on Attitudes of employers towards employing ex-prisoners and ex-offenders, Nigel Waters' paper (PDF) on Implications for Privacy Laws noted earlier in this profile and the 2005 Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission On the Record: Guidelines for the prevention of discrimination in employment on the basis of criminal record document (following the HREOC 2004 discussion paper on Discrimination in Employment on the basis of Criminal Record).

subsection marker icon     studies


Academic perspectives are provided in 'Do Not Pass Go: The impact of criminal record checks on employment in Australia' by Bronwyn Naylor in 30(4) Alternative Law Journal (2005) 174-179;





icon for link to next page   next page (homes)




this site
the web

Google

version of June 2007
© Bruce Arnold
caslon.com.au | caslon analytics