overview
technologies
etopia
dystopia
information
geopolitics
rights
time
spaces
cities
bodies
datasmog
gender
intelligence
community
culture
education
commerce
work
play
happiness
the state
war & peace
forecasting
declinism
futures

related
Guides:
Economy
|
declinism
This
page considers 'declinism' - anxieties about relative
or absolute cultural and economic decline in which digital
technology is claimed as a cause or as a solution.
It covers -
introduction
For many people the golden age is the generation before
last, an era after which economic performance (or prospects)
and morals grew worse. Pessimism about the future, often
expressed by elites in cultures enjoying unprecedented
levels of comfort - is deeply traditional. Claims that
a society, nation or region is in 'decline' are a counterpoint
to the ideology of progress that has driven much western
development, with people expecting that the following
generation will be better and and succeeding generations
will enjoy even greater benefits.
That decline can be absolute, with a perceptible decrease
in mortality and employment, increased unemployment and
crime, greater civil disorder, lower return on investment
or loss of territory and respect. It may instead be relative:
some states and regions advance more quickly than others,
today's leader becomes tomorrow's follower, absolute increases
in wellbeing may seem less important than a perceived
decline (or potential decline) relative to a peer.
Declinism is thus as much about perceptions as it is about
realities.
One reason is the difficulty of measurement, evident in
recurrent disagreement about China's economy (with the
Asian Development Bank for example suggesting in 2007
that GDP is 40% smaller than indicated by the World Bank).
Another reason is that decline, whether historic or forecast,
can be attributed to a range of factors, from the enervating
effects of hot baths, rock & roll and old age pensions
to gentrification of English entrepreneurs, 'excessive'
taxation, 'imperial overstretch' and industrial 'hollowing
out' through emphasis on services rather than manufacturing.
US theorist Samuel Huntington noted the moral value of
declinism, commenting that "It provides a warning
and a goad to action in order to head off and reverse
the decline that it says is taking place". Declinism,
in the digital environment or otherwise, is a theatre
for polemicists, one in which the decorations change but
themes recur. Some past claims - for example fin-de-siecle
anxieties about the imminent end of civilisation through
the 'rise of the colored races' and 1920s eugenics obscenity
on the need for 'social prophylaxis' - have echoes in
the more extravagant contemporary rhetoric about the decline
of the US
the
West - wedded to a multiculturalism that undercuts its
own confidence, a welfare state that nudges it toward
sloth and self-indulgence, and a childlessness that
consigns it to oblivion - is looking ever more like
the ruins of a civilization.
Many
prescriptions for averting or reversing decline also sound
familiar, including reduction of taxes and bureaucracy,
increased 'law and order', stricter disciplining of children,
a return to the classics, greater censorship, shorter
hair (but not too short) and an emphasis on outdoor exercise.
As an embodiment of modernity the net has not been exempt
from those nostrums.
A perspective is provided in The Idea of Decline in
Western History (New York: Free Press 1997) by Arthur
Herman, The Perfectibility of Man (London: Duckworth
1970) by John Passmore, History of the Idea of Progress
(New Brunswick: Transaction 1994) by Robert Nisbet
and The Idea of Progress. An Inquiry into Its Origin
and Growth (London: Macmillan 1920) by John Bury.
the nation of the future
The problematical nature of many announcements of the
'nation of the future', expressions of hubris by the country
in the 'passing lane' and angst on the part of the superceded
nation is evident in a succession of works that include
-
- 'The
Geographical Pivot of History' (1904) by Halford Mackinder
- Le
défi américain [The American
Challenge (New York: Atheneum 1968)] Jean-Jacques
Servan-Schreiber
- The
Emerging Japanese Superstate. Challenge and Response
(London: Deutsch 1971) by Herman Kahn
- Japan
as Number 1: Lessons for America (Cambridge: Harvard
Uni Press 1979) by Ezra Vogel
- America
as an Ordinary Country (Ithaca: Cornell Uni Press
1979) edited by Richard Rosecrance
- Japan
in the Passing Lane (London: Counterpoint 1984)
by Satoshi Kamata
- The
Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random
House 1987) and Preparing for the Twenty-First Century
(New York: Random 1993) by Paul Kennedy
- The
Japan That Can Say No (New York: Harper 1991) by
Shintaro Ishihara
- The
Chinese Century: The Rising Chinese Economy and Its
Impact on the Global Economy, the Balance of Power,
and Your Job (Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing
2004) by Oded Shenkar
Responses
include The Sun Also Sets: The Limits to Japan's Economic
Power (New York: Simon & Schuster 1989) by Bill
Emmott, The Coming Collapse of China (New York:
Random 2001) by Gordon Chang.
Contemporary
'barbarians at the gates' literature includes -
- Nemesis:
The Last Days of the American Republic (New York:
Metropolitan 2007) by Chalmers Johnson
- The
End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics
of the Twenty-first Century (New York: Knopf 2002)
by Charles Kupchan
-
Are We Rome?: The Fall of an Empire and the Fate
of America (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2007) by Cullen
Murphy
- America
Alone: The End of the World as We Know It (Washington:
Regnery 2006) by Mark Steyn
- The
Roman Predicament (Princeton: Princeton Uni Press
2006) by Harold James
As
the preceding paragraphs indicate, much of that writing
is very traditional, an echo of US lamentations in the
1950s, British and German fin-de-siecle anxieties,
and denunciations in the 1790s or beyond. Perspectives
are provided in The American Jeremiad (Madison:
Uni of�Wisconsin Press 1978) by Sacvan Bercovitch and
The Imperial Tense: Problems and Prospects of American
Empire (Chicago: Dee 2003) edited by Andrew Bacevich.
digital measures
How do you measure absolute and relative declines, particularly
if you are conscious of the problematical
nature of many statistics and are skeptical about voodoo
from gurus whose confidence on occasion is in inverse
proportion to the accuracy of their forecasts?
Enthusiasts have used -
- basic
measures of teledensity,
typically counting the number of landlines and mobiles
but not grappling with more fundamental questions of
how that connectivity is used
- notions
of 'e-readiness' in
developing international rankings or promoting the idea
of a 'broadband gap' (reminiscent of the 1960s 'missile
gap') that should be reduced through government support
- typically through concessions favouring incumbent
network operators
- differing
metrics regarding regional, sectoral and national digital
divides
digital fixes, digital fears
Dot com enthusiasts have proposed a range of 'fixes' to
address supposed national, local or sectoral declines
- real or imagined.
Those fixes include -
- e-democracy,
with rhetoric about 'netroots' and digital plebiscites
as mechanisms to deal with voter alienation, the tyranny
of 'machine politics' and disenfranchisement of the
poor or the 'silent majority'. MoveOn, YouGov, IBNIS
and Facebook are
thus proposed as a a solution for Putnam's 'bowling
alone'
- e-government,
with electronic networks bridging gaps between citizens
and officials, reducing costs and increasing responsiveness
or accountability
- e-business,
with the 'glass pipeline' in supply chains, etailing
and more targeted marketing claimed as lowering costs
- e-health,
with patients having access to independent information
(albeit with a risk of cyberchondria),
governments cutting service delivery costs and service
providers being able to readily integrate data for improved
dignosis/treatment
- e-education
For
others digital technologies are the problem, not the solution.
Concerns include notions that -
-
silicon fibre is sapping a nation's moral fibre, requiring
censorship of online
content, or enables communication by terrorists
- crowdsourcing
is eroding the livelihoods of education
and that UGC such as Wikipedia
will lead the 'digitally illiterate'
astray
- corporate
cost-cutting through extensive offshoring will result
in hollowing-out of industry and pose fundamental dangers
regarding identity crime
- the
'always on' society of 'teleworkers' or 'connected workers'
represents a digital Fordism that chills creativity
and poisons family life
- advanced
economies are becoming 'surveillance
states', with the 'death of privacy',
panoptic sorting on the basis of data mined by information
brokers and their
clients, and abuse of tools such as RFIDs
and ECHELON
- erosion
of free speech and of scope for creativity and learning
through over-reaching responses by intellectual
property owners to developments such as file-sharing
and mashing
- the
net, more so than television, is an 'electronic wasteland',
characterised by trivia,
gawking, 'cyber-addiction'
and 'information overload'.
next page (futures)
|
|