Caslon Analytics elephant logo title for Digital Divides profile
home | about | site use | resources | publications | timeline   spacer graphic   blaw

overview

concepts

N America

L America

W Europe

E Europe

Australia

New Zealand

Asia

Middle East

Africa


Oceania

missions

initiatives

claims





related pages icon
related
Guides:

Metrics &
Statistics


Networks &
the GII
 


section heading icon     Sub-saharan Africa

This page considers digital divides in sub-saharan Africa.

It covers -

  • orientation - questions about African divides
  • measures - some key statistics of development and connectivity
  • issues
  • studies - major academic, NGO and government studies about African connectivity and its social underpinnings

section marker icon     orientation

Digital divides in subsaharan Africa reflect infrastructure challenges and broader problems with economic and cultural development. In 2007 the World Bank highlighted international connectivity as the 'missing link', noting that the region accounts for less than one percent of the world’s bandwidth capacity. The Bank reported that twenty countries "lack direct terrestrial access" to the GII (equated with international fibre cable) and as a result were forced to rely on expensive satellite connectivity for links with each other and the rest of the world. That

translates into some of the highest communications costs in the world. International wholesale bandwidth prices are 20 to 40 times higher than in the United States, and international calls are on average 10 to 20 times more than in other developing countries.

In late 2001 the International Telecommunications Union announced that there are now more than twice as many telephone lines in Africa as in Tokyo, questioning the claim that "Tokyo has more telephones than the whole of the African continent".

That was reinforced by a 2005 World Bank report claiming that there were 59 million fixed-line or mobile phones in Africa in 2002, contradicting the claim by Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade at a 2004 UN news conference that there were more telephones in Manhattan than in all of Africa.

The report sniffed that

Unless New Yorkers and their commuter friends have 12 phones each, Africa now has many more telephones than Manhattan.

This site questions what is a very crude measure of teledensity: the ITU counts lines but does not identify whether they are working, who is using them and how much the traffic costs. Ten lines to urban villas of the kleptocrats, for example, have a different value to ten lines in regular use by poor farmers in a remote village.

The distribution of those lines is even more problematical, since independent research suggests that Capetown and Johannesburg for example account for a large proportion of the continent's lines.

The ITU, discussed in the Networks & GII guide, argues that mobiles will come to the rescue, claiming that by the end of 2001 more people in Africa will use mobile telephony than fixed-line connections and that there will be three times as many mobile users in Africa than fixed-line users by 2003, climbing to 98 million while fixed line use increases to 32 million. As of June 2004 there were 18.7 million registered mobile phone subscribers in South Africa out of a population of 46 million, with wide use by low income groups for receiving calls and text messages (free with a basic service plan).

Between 1970 and 2002 the sub-Saharan states received over US$294 billion in aid, repaying US$268 billion. Residual debt after interest, malfeasance and ineptitude amounted to US$210 billion

section marker icon     measures

As of 2004 population and GDP (US$ billion purchasing power parity) for selected states in sub-saharan Africa was -

state

Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Chad
Cote d'Ivoire
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Sierre Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Population

13.5
6.70
1.70
12.2
7.20
16.0
8.50
16.8
68.6
1.30
1.40
20.0
31.9
1.80
3.30
16.8
10.9
11.6
1.20
18.8
2.00
11.7
135
8.20
10.0
5.30
45.3
33.5
1.10
35.8
4.80
25.2
10.4
13.1
GDP

31
7
14
14
4
33
10
24
49
8
2
45
33
4

13
6
11
13
21
12
9
138
10
17
3
475
68
5
21
7
37
9
30

The GDP figure for Australia and New Zealand was US$571 billion and US$85 billion respectively.

An ITU report for 2003 identifies 'main' landlines and aggregate subscribers (landline and mobile) -

state lines per 100 people total subscribers (m)
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Chad
Cote d'Ivoire
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Sierre Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe

0.67
0.95
8.28
0.53
0.34
0.70
0.15
1.97
0.63
2.87
2.89
1.35
1.04
1.32
0.36
0.81
0.53
28.5
0.46
6.62
0.19
0.69
0.28
2.21
0.48
10.7
2.70
4.43
0.42
1.21
0.24
0.79
2.56

0.21
0.30
0.57
0.29
0.08
0.81
0.04
1.56
0.52
0.33
0.13
1.10
1.91
0.12
0.33
0.22
0.10
0.81
0.34
0.35
0.04
4.00
0.13
0.80
0.09
18.4
1.55
0.13
1.01
0.28
0.83
0.33
0.68

and internet hosts (per 10,000 inhabitants) and personal computers (per 100 inhabitants) -

state

Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Chad
Cote d'Ivoire
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierre Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe

hosts

0.01
1.22
10.9
0.36
0.03
0.29
0.01
2.28

2.12
4.16
0.17
2.63
0.55
0.47
0.02
0.17
32.6
1.73
16.4
0.11
0.09
1.78
0.65
33.0
0.56
62.6

13.4
1.57
0.16
1.00
1.68
3.83

PCs

0.19
0.37
4.07
0.21
0.18
0.57
0.17
0.93
0.22
2.24
1.43
0.38
0.65

0.49
0.15
0.14
14.8
0.45
9.93
0.06
0.71

2.12
16.0

7.26
0.61
2.87
0.57
3.20
0.40
0.85
5.37

The percentage of people online, for how long and for what is unknown, given the paucity of comprehensive academic studies and the indifference of commercial metrics specialists. Estimates of the number of personal computers (shipped and, more problematically, in use) should be treated with caution.

The Transparency International 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index ranked selected African states as follows (with New Zealand, Sweden, Australia and Canada at 2, 6, 9 and 12 respectively) -

state

Botswana
South Africa
Mauritius
Namibia
Ghana
Gabon
Benin
Mali
Madagascar
Senegal
Gambia
Malawi
Mozambique
Tanzania
Uganda
Zambia
Ethiopia
Sierra Leone
Zimbabwe
Niger
Sudan
Cameroon
Kenya
Angola
Cote d'Ivoire
Chad
Nigeria
rank

31
44
54
54
64
74
77
77
82
85
90
90
90
90
102
102
114
114
114
122
122
129
129
133
133
142
144

The UNDP report for 2004 suggested that life expectancy at birth and adult literacy (%, ages 15 plus) was -

state

Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Chad
Cote d'Ivoire
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierre Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
expectancy

40
50
41
45
40
46
44
41
45
56
53
57
45
36
53
37
48
71
38
46
46
51
38
52
72
34
48
55
35
43
49
45
32
33

literacy

42
39
76
12
50
67
45
49
41
71
37
73
84
81
67
61
19
84
46
82
17
66
69
39
91
36
86
59
80
77
59
68
79
90

section marker icon     issues

[under development]

section marker icon     studies

The most substantial report on African digital divides is the SANGONeT report on The Status of the Internet in Africa.

For gender issues see the 266 page International Development Research Centre report edited by Eva Rathgeber & Edith Ofwona Adera on Gender and the Information Revolution in Africa (2000).

The US National Research Council's report Bridge Builders: African Experiences with Information and Communication Technology, (Washington: National Academy Press 1996) and Beyond Boundaries: Cyberspace in Africa (Portsmouth: Heinemann 2002) by Melinda Robins & Robert Hilliard are of value. Telecommunications Politics: Ownership & Control of the Information Highway in Developing Countries (Hillsdale: Erlbaum 1995) edited by Bella Mody & Johannes Bauer discusses infrastructure investment challenges.

As background we recommend Exporting Communication Technology to Developing Countries (New York: Universities Press of America 1999) by Emmanuel Ngwainmbi, Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries (Aldershot: Ashgate 2001) edited by Chrisanthi Avgerou & Geoff Walsham, India's Communication Revolution: From Bullock Carts to Cyber Marts (New Delhi: Sage 2001) by Arvind Singhal & Everett Rogers, Development & Communication in Africa (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2004) edited by Charles Okigbo & Festus Eribo and Information Resources & Technology Transfer Management in Developing Countries (London: Routledge 1997) by Richard Ouma-Onyango.

Fred Kofi de Heer-Menlah's succinct 2002 ACM article on Internet Access for African Countries regarding factors that hinder/help development of internet access in Africa offered the following wish list for governments (and donors) -

  • the numerous controls imposed by governments continue to retard the development of net access
  • governments should develop a well-planned scalable telecommunication infrastructure capable of utilising new technologies as they arise
  • the infrastructure must be maintained and constantly upgraded in line with modern technology
  • web presence should be promoted with the use of the ccTLD, with ccTLD management as a public service charging a minimal fee for domain name registrations so that private companies act as registrars and value-added sellers.
  • the need for a policy for every player in the hi-tech industry and related fields that a certain quota of their services be offered to the rural community and another quota towards education in the rural community for each year.




icon for link to next page   next page (Oceania)




this site
the web

Google

version of June 2007
© Bruce Arnold
caslon.com.au | caslon analytics