overview
issues
geopolitics
models
jurisdictions
disorder
mercatoria
government
business
liberties
cosmocrats
netizens
services
rights

related
Guides:
Networks
& the GII
Security &
InfoCrime
Digital
Economy

related
Profiles:
ICANN
auDA
ITU |
issues
This page identifies some key regulatory issues and points
to basic writing about particular challenges. Is there
law in cyberspace? Whose law is it? Does it work? How
is it evolving?
It covers -
the debate about governance
Regulation of cyberspace became inevitable once the
net ceased to be the realm of wizards or scientists and
became an infrastructure connecting millions of individuals,
businesses and governments. Mythologies to the contrary,
emerging systems of governance are an extension of the
basic standards that allow devices and networks to join
together via the internet.
For better or worse, 'normalisation' of the web means
that it is just another part of daily life. Claims that
we can become citizens of the ether
or that cyberspace is (and should be) a realm without
law are no longer very credible. Overall, the guides on
this site suggest that the fun is just beginning, as we
all move from airy generalities to the hard tasks of developing
practical law, industry codes, enforcement and dispute
resolution mechanisms, and the community perceptions that
underpin any regime.
Much of the debate about governance of cyberspace has
been shaped by what critics such as Richard Barbrook
have dubbed the 'Californian Ideology', a heady mix of
faith in the emancipatory power of new technologies, visceral
hostility to regulation and belief that markets will solve
all problems. Its proponents
argue that regulation is neither desirable nor possible,
since the net - a personification of markets - treats
such efforts as "damage and routs around it".
It is reflected in disagreements about the role and operation
of bodies such as ICANN. More broadly it is a major theme
of media coverage, government policy making and thinking
about life online. While the 'mainstreaming' of the web
means that cyberlibertarianism is likely to be less significant
in future, it will be an influence throughout this decade.
implications
Online or offline, regulation involves the interaction
of three factors:
- a
system of rules, formalised as law or otherwise, that
articulates norms for behaviour
- institutions
to develop, interpret and enforce those rules
- agreement
among those who administer the rules and are affected
by them that the regulatory regime has some basis at
a conceptual and practical level
Regulating cyberspace thus requires the development of
laws and codes of practice that reflect specific challenges
such as the 'borderless' nature of the internet, uncertainty
about identity and authentication, and debate about privacy.
Although cyberspace is "everywhere and nowhere",
no-one lives in cyberspace. The internet has thus not
abolished traditional local/national jurisdictions or
the international agreements that provide a global legal
framework by harmonize differences between those jurisdictions.
It's unlikely to be described using a comprehensive Lex
Internet.
Regulation also assumes action by institutions - whether
existing or new, public or private - operating at a local,
national and international level.
Some theorists identified later in this guide have argued
for entirely new institutions, often separate from existing
policy development, standard setting and dispute resolution
mechanisms. Others - more credibly - prefer not throw
away the baby and the bath water, instead emphasising
the scope for existing courts, parliaments, businesses,
police forces and other bodies.
Just as importantly, governance of cyberspace involves
some sense by those who go online that the regulatory
regime is 'legitimate', that particular behaviour is in
principle unacceptable and in practice is likely to result
in sanctions. Those sanctions might be 'trivial', such
as a business's loss of customers. Or they might involve
courts and police forces.
Major legitimacy challenges include
- perceptions
that particular activities are legal or without consequence
(eg in principle "information just wants to be
free", in practice you won't get caught)
- claims
that there should be no regulation per se, and
more subtly
-
a refusal to engage with institutions (eg participate
in the operation of bodies such as auDA) or address
technological realities (eg government legislation that's
clearly ineffective because of basic features of the
network).
There
is a valuable introduction in Jonathan Weinberg's article
on ICANN & the Problem of Legitimacy and in
the essays in Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates, & Pirate
Utopias (Cambridge: MIT Press 1999) edited by Peter
Ludlow.
overviews
The provocative Code & Other Laws of Cyberspace
(New York: Basic Books 1999) by Lawrence Lessig is an
introduction to governance issues from one US legal perspective.
A more nuanced - and for us more convincing - analysis
is provided in Anne-Marie Slaughter's A New World
Order (Princeton: Princeton Uni Press 2004).
Graham Greenleaf's 1998 Uni of NSW Law Journal
article
An Endnote on Regulating Cyberspace: Architecture vs
Law, Craig McTaggart's 1999 Governance of the
Internet's Infrastructure: Network Policy for the Global
Public Network thesis (PDF)
and Joel Reidenberg's 2004 States & Internet Enforcement
paper consider
Australian, Canadian, US and global public policymaking.
For a wider view we recommend Brian Loader's The Governance
of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology & Global Restructuring
(London: Routledge 1997), Klaus Grewlich's Governance
In Cyberspace: Access & Public Interest in
Global Communications (Hague: Kluwer 1999) and
ICT Law & Internationalisation: A Survey of Government
Views (Hague: Kluwer 2000) by Bert-Jaap Koops,
The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance
(Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press 2002) edited by Rodney
Hall & Thomas Biersteker and Imperialism, Sovereignty
& the Making of International Law (Cambridge:
Cambridge Uni Press 2005) by Anthony Anghie. Radicals
for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American
Libertarian Movement (New York: Public Affairs 2007)
by Brian Doherty offers context.
Ethan Katsh's Law in a Digital World (Oxford: Oxford
Uni Press 1995) builds on his 1989 study The Electronic
Media and the Transformation of the Law in asking
are
these new technologies merely more efficient versions
of the old? Are they simply new containers that bring
the same product to the users in a new way? Do they
simply move information faster? Or does the use of information
in a new form particularly by an institution for whom
information is a highly valued commodity, change the
institution, the user and those who come in contact
with the user?
There
is a more pragmatic analysis in Regulating The Global
Information Society (London: Routledge 2000) edited
by Christopher Marsden.
David Post's polemic
Anarchy, State & the Internet: An Essay on Law-Making
in Cyberspace articulates arguments for and against
a communitarian approach.
Michael Hart's lucid The American Internet Advantage:
Global Themes & Implications of the Modern World
(Lanham: University Press of America 2000) and papers
in Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International
Competition & Regulation in Communications (Washington:
Brookings Institution 1989) edited by Robert Crandall
& Kenneth Flamm consider ongoing US dominance of the
web.
Giampiero Giacomello's paper
on National Governments & the Regulation of the
Internet offers an EU perspective, reflected in the
European Commission's package
of Legislative Proposals for a new Regulatory Framework
for Electronic Communications, with directives on
telecommunications privacy, access and interconnection
among others.
Some analysis in the series of papers from the Harvard
Information Infrastructure Project (HIIP)
is looking quite dated. However, the HIIP volumes are
invaluable. We particularly commend Coordinating the
Internet (Cambridge: MIT Press 1997) edited by Brian
Kahin & James Keller - governance, domain naming,
trademarks, traffic management and pricing - and Borders
In Cyberspace (1997) edited by Brian Kahin & Charles
Nesson - privacy, global rule-making, jurisdictions and
other issues.
The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals
in Charge & Changing the World We Know (New York:
PublicInterest 1999) by Andrew Shapiro
argues that although governance is a key concern, "our
notions of regulation, rights and justice will have to
evolve as power shifts increasingly to individuals". Catchy
title, but we're unconvinced by the argument. Shapiro
is a Fellow at Harvard's Berkman Internet Law Centre;
he offers a more succinct rendition in his 2000 Columbia
Science & Technology Law Review article
on The 'Principles In Context' Approach To Internet
Policymaking.
Shapiro's assessment is undermined by essays in Non-State
Actors & Authority in the Global System (London:
Routledge 2000), edited by Richard Higgott & Andreas
Bieler, and Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral
Economic Institutions & Global Social Movements
(Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press 2000) by Robert O'Brien
& Anne Marie Goetz and Bringing Transnational Relations
Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures & International
Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press 1995)
edited by Thomas Risse-Kappen.
There is an outstanding overview of national and international
regulatory mechanisms in Global Business Regulation
(Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press 2000) by John Braithwaite
& Peter Drahos.
next page
(models)
|
|