overview
past
& future
economics
studies
delivery
formats
monographs
dissertations
fiction
e-journals
newspapers
directories
film
music
webcasts
interactive
editing
business
education
government
culture
e-texts
devices
libraries
digitisation
on demand
rights trade
UGC
DIY
CMS
writing
landmarks

related
Guides:
Intellectual
Property
Censorship
Design
Accessibility
Information
Economy
|
writing
Digital guru Clay Shirky claimed in 2002 that "Writing
as a special talent became obsolete in the 19th century.
The bottleneck was publishing". That assertion has
been echoed in claims that we are all writers now.
Raymond Kurzweill went further, writing in the November
2007 Atlantic that
The
means of creativity have now been democratized. For
example, anyone with an inexpensive high-definition
video camera and a personal computer can create a high-quality,
full-length motion picture. A musician in her dorm room
commands the resources once available only in a multimillion-dollar
recording studio.
As
noted in discussion elsewhere on this site regarding blogging
and podcasting) many readers would consider that mere
use of a keyboard and a server does not gift the 'writer'
with talent. Having a keyboard doesn't make you Ingmar
Bergman or even Ed Wood. The musician in the dorm room
has tools but, with apologies to Kurzweil, tools do not
equal the greatness possessed by Mahler or Mozart.
Mark Dery questioned
the digital pieties -
Another
fit of spleen: This ghastly notion, popularized by Masters
of Their Own Domain like Jeff Jarvis, that every piece
of writing is a "conversation." It's a no-brainer
that writing is a communicative act, and always has
been. And I'll eagerly grant the point that composing
in a dialogic medium like the net is like typing onstage,
in Madison Square Garden, with Metallica laying down
a speed metal beat behind you. You're writing on the
fly, which is halfway between prose and speech. But
the Jarvises of the world forget that not all writing
published online is written online. I dearly loathe
Jarvis's implication that all writing, online or off,
should sound like water-cooler conversation; that content
is all that matters; that foppish literati should stop
sylphing around and submit to the tyranny of the pyramid
lead; and that any mind that can't squeeze its thoughts
into bullet points should just die. This is the beige,
soul-crushing logic of the PowerPoint mind. What will
happen, I wonder, when we have to write for the postage-stamp
screen of the iPod? The age of IM prose is waiting in
the wings...
next page
(publishing
landmarks)
|
|