Caslon Analytics elephant logo title for Sedition note
home | about | site use | resources | publications | timeline   spacer graphic   Ketupa

overview

concepts

Australia

UK

Canada

US

Europe

elsewhere

cases

online


blacklists

mutiny

landmarks














related pages icon
related
Guides:


Free speech & censorship

Hatespeech
& politics


Governance

Security
& InfoCrime








related pages icon
related
Profiles:


Flag burning

Surveillance

section heading icon     Canada and New Zealand

This page discusses other sedition regimes

It covers -

As with the preceding page it supplements the discussion elsewhere on this site of censorship and hatespeech.

subsection heading icon    
Canada

The Canadian regime derives from the UK.

Part II of the Canadian Criminal Code deals with 'Offences against Public Order'. It includes sedition (ss. 59-61), treason (ss. 46-50), sabotage (s. 52), incitement to mutiny (s. 53) and an offence of intimidating Parliament or the legislature of a province by an act of violence (s. 51).

Seditious intention encompasses everyone who

a) teaches or advocates, or

b) publishes or circulates any writing that advocates,

the use, without the authority of law, of force as a means of accomplishing a governmental change within Canada.

In 1951 the Supreme Court of Canada - in Boucher v The King - held that although a leaflet by a Jehovah's Witness was intended to engender protest and indignation against the government (including the courts), that alone was insufficient for a conviction -

An intention to bring the administration of justice into hatred and contempt or exert disaffection against it is not sedition unless there is also the intention to incite people to violence against it

subsection heading icon     sedition law in New Zealand

In New Zealand current restrictions on sedition under the Crimes Act essentially prohibit only the advocacy of violence or disobedience to law.

It is not sedition to urge any change in the law, however radical, and political expression under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1986 cannot be seditious. A school teacher was thus found not guilty of "disrespecting the flag" after incinerating one during an anti-war march in 2003. (The Australian flag burning regime is discussed here.)

Section 81 of the Crimes Act currently makes it an offence to

(a) To bring into hatred or contempt, or to excite disaffection against, Her Majesty, or the Government of New Zealand, or the administration of justice; or
(b) To incite the public or any persons or any class of persons to attempt to procure otherwise than by lawful means the alteration of any matter affecting the Constitution, laws, or Government of New Zealand; or
(c) To incite, procure, or encourage violence, lawlessness, or disorder; or
(d) To incite, procure, or encourage the commission of any offence that is prejudicial to the public safety or to the maintenance of public order; or
(e) To excite such hostility or ill will between different classes of persons as may endanger the public safety.

The right of jury trial in sedition cases was taken away in 1951, apparently over concerns that jury members might not share an anti-communist zeal, but was restored in 1960.

Prior to 2004, with action against activist Tim Selwyn for seditious conspiracy, there appear to have been no prosecutions over the past 50 years. Earlier prosecutions are highlighted later in this note.

Selwyn was jailed for two month in July 2006, having admitted to conspiring to commit wilful damage when an axe was embedded in Prime Minister Helen Clark's electoral office window in November 2004. He had admitted in court to "having a hand" in separate statements - variously characterised as media releases and pamphlets - claiming responsibility for the attack and calling for "like minded New Zealanders to take similar action of their own".

He was concurrently sentenced to 15 months on fraud charges, including obtaining the passport under a dead baby's name, along with a birth certificate, benefits and four Inland Revenue Department numbers under the names of dead people. He used the false passport and birth certificate in 1993 and 1995 to gain NZ$11,141 in unemployment and accommodation supplement benefits.

subsection heading icon     treason law in New Zealand

Under section 73 of the Crimes Act, treason includes

to kill or wound the sovereign, to levy war against New Zealand, to assist an enemy at war with New Zealand and to use force for the purpose of overthrowing the Government of New Zealand.

As in Australia there have only been a handful of prosecutions. The single execution appears to be that of Hamiora Pere in 1869 during the Te Kooti War.

Prosecutions and imprisonment for treason were undertaken on other occasions, with Ngawaka Taurua and 94 other Maori men for example being tried for treason in the Supreme Court in Wellington in 1869 following disputes about colonisation. Taurua and 74 associates were found guilty and imprisoned in Dunedin gaol but released in the early 1870s.

subsection heading icon     studies

For Pere see James Belich's The New Zealand Wars (Auckland: Penguin 1988) and Judith Binney's Redemption Songs: A Life of Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki (Auckland: Auckland Uni Press 1995).

  




icon for link to next page    next page  (US)



this site
the web

Google

version of May 2006
© Bruce Arnold