overview
statistics
studies
hearts
e-brides
law
scams
fidelity
cautions

related
Guides:
Consumers
& Trust
Identity
Crime

related
Profiles:
Social
Network
Services
Vigilantes
Defamation
Cyberstalking
Forgery &
Forensics
Adult
Content
|
scams
This page considers online matchmaking scams.
It covers -
introduction
A preceding page of this profile noted concerns regarding
'e-bride' schemes, sometimes associated with human trafficking
or beset with misrepresentation and other fraud.
It is important to recognise that misbehaviour is not
restricted to cross-border romances. Scams occur within
Australia, New Zealand, the UK and other countries rather
than being restricted to dating someone who claims to
be living in Russia, the Ukraine or the Philippines.
That is evident in some identity
crimes discussed elsewhere on this site.
UK scammer Emma Golightly, for example, attracted media
attention (and what was arguably an overly short time
in prison) for the zest with which she conned men met
through dating sites and via acquaintances. She posed
as a paediatric surgeon, tugging heart strings and opening
wallets with tales of her work caring for kids with cancer.
She also posed as a successful entrepreneur, worth millions
and looking for the right man.
In one scam she claimed to be a website designer earning
£60,000 a year, the daughter of a millionaire father
who was a High Court judge. She was supposedly born in
South Africa, educated in Dallas and went to university
at 16 because she had a stellar IQ. That did not save
her from being raped by the man she married at 17, a brute
who pushed her down the stairs so that she had lost her
unborn twins. But wait, there's more - her mother had
died of cancer. None of the stories were true but they
persuaded one beau to give her a £1,000 engagement
ring. Another called off the romance after discovering
that his cards were lighter by £80,000.
Confrere David Davies was ordered to repay over £100,000
extracted from UK women met through online dating services
in response to his request for "attractive lady,
good conversation and a zest for life and the better things
it has to offer". Like Golightly he had embroidered
his past, falsely claiming to be a member of the elite
SAS, a structural engineer and engaged in government work
so secret that it could not be disclosed to his nearest
and dearest - several of whom were near & dear concurrently.
Davies blithely kept some of the proceeds in a special
compartment in his Porsche, apparently reinforcing his
own fantasies about his status as a man of mystery.
mechanisms
How do the scams work?
There is no single mechanism: as in the days of wandering
confidence men (and women) or newspaper lonelyhearts columns
the scammers use a range of strategies to exploit the
good faith - or stupidity - of their victims. The scale
of the exploitation also varies, from free meals and spare
change through to misuse of credit cards and cheque accounts
amounting to over $100,000.
Some scammers gain the confidence of victims online but
extract the money offline through face to face contact.
Observers have occasionally argued that particular victims
are likely to be especially wary of claims made online
but proportionately much less cautious about lies made
to their face.
Some dating scammers never meet their victims, instead
operating wholly online. The complexity of their appeals
varies. It reflects the scammer's experience and skills.
It also reflects the scammer's assessment of the victim
(in terms of vulnerability and assets).
It often resembles the 'Nigerian' or '419'
Scams discussed in more detail elsewhere on this site,
with a structured interaction between scammer and victim
persuading the victim that he/she is dealing with a genuine
person and that the victim cannot withdraw from contact
despite what an independent observer would regard as howling
implausibilities.
It is clear that a victim who has provided goods or money
will be asked for more (and will often respond to recurrent
requests by continuing to give, often on an escalating
basis). It is also clear that, as with 419 scams, some
people are recurrent victims - falling for a series of
e-dating fraudsters rather than learning from one or two
bitter experiences. One UK report thus noted victimisation
of a man who sent £10,000 to a Russian woman so
that she could gain a visa and ticket to meet him. He
visited Heathrow airport on four occasions: each time
she did not arrive. Undeterred, he shifted to a 'Christian'
dating site, eventually sending £6,000 to a woman
in Senegal (or someone who claimed to be a woman and in
Senegal). Alas, she also did not arrive.
What do scammers ask for? The usual pattern seems to be
a gift as a token of regard at the beginning of the relationship
(and as a test by the scammer of whether it is worth investing
time in cultivating the victim). The scammer may persuade
the victim to provide a cheque or make a debit/credit
card payment, for example because the scammer has ostensibly
suffered some sort of unexpected and temporary business
reverse, has had an accident or an unanticipated tax demand
that requires immediate cash, or needs to help a sick
friend/relative.
Once the relationship is underway, some scammers seek
money that will ostensibly enable them to travel to the
victims - taking cash, using a credit card or an air ticket.
The latter tends to reinforce the victim's sense that
a face to face meeting will take place and lulls suspicion,
despite the fact that many tickets are convertible (ie
can be exchanged for cash from the airline or can be 'resold'
at a discount to a genuine traveler).
The scammer will sometimes deal with non-arrival by telling
the victim that the ticket was non-transferable and that
he/she did not make the flight because of reasons that
will elicit the victim's sympathy (eg a parent or child
died, the scammer was in a serious accident), thereby
setting up the victim to provide another ticket. Scammers
operating across borders will often excuse non-arrival
by claiming that at the last minute it was necessary to
bribe corrupt officials.
Other scammers are more ingenious.
One routine is to pose as a fellow national, living in
another city but needing to travel overseas for business
or to see relatives.
Prior to the first face to face meeting (or even after
that meeting) the scammer contacts the victim by phone
or email, seeking help to escape from a dire situation.
That crisis typically involves something such as -
- thieves
have stolen the scammer's passport
during an overseas visit (bribing officials to overlook
the absence of a passport is more expensive than simply
replacing a stolen air ticket)
- the
scammer has been arrested by corrupt officials for an
innocent infraction of rules (eg a trivial traffic accident)
or to extort money from the scammer and the victim must
accordingly send money, lots of money, to rescue the
beloved
- the
scammer has been seized by criminals in a state such
as Gabon or Colombia and the victim must accordingly
pay ransom money if the beloved is not to be killed,
forced to live on cockroaches or be deprived of fingers
and other body parts.
The
scammer claims that he/she will repay every cent once
freed from bondage and the indifference of diplomats.
Of course there is no repayment and the scammer (who might
be sitting comfortably at home or in a cybercafe
in the next suburb) never appears.
That routine updates the so-called Spanish
Prisoner (or Turkish Prisoner) scam that has been
apparent since the Middle Ages and is discussed in works
such as Arthur Leff's Swindling and Selling: The Spanish
Prisoner & Other Bargains (New York: Free Press
1976).
Technologies change, hearts do not.
next page (fidelity)
|
|